Vermont ranks 49th in 'Rich States, Poor States' report

-A A +A

Vermont ranks 49th in 'Rich States, Poor States' report

Thu, 06/08/2017 - 3:56pm -- tim

Vermont Business Magazine ALEC-Laffer “Rich States' Poor States” was released earlier this spring with Vermont ranked in its usual spot: Next to dead last. In the 10 years of the ranking, Vermont has finished in the penultimately worst position every year but one and New York has finished last in every year but one, 2013, when the two states briefly switched positions.

The “Rich States” report in authored by Reagan-era economist Arthur B Laffer. The report is not a report of each state’s wealth, but of its economic competitiveness based mostly on its tax policy. The American Legislative Exchange Council itself attempts to influence legislative policy on taxes, workers compensation and union laws, etc, on behalf of economic opportunity.

The report judges economic performance by state GDP, migration and employment growth. It does not factor in other outcome measures, such as educational attainment, unemployment rate or median household income.

Last September, the Wall Street Journal ranked all states by median household income based on 2015 US Census Bureau data. The average median household income was $55,775. They ranged from $75,847 in Maryland to $40,593 in Mississippi. Vermont was 20th highest ($56,990), between Rhode Island ($58,073) and Pennsylvania ($55,702).

The top five highest were Maryland, Hawaii, Alaska, New Jersey and Connecticut. The five lowest were Mississippi, Arkansas, West Virginia, Alabama and Kentucky.

In contrast to its performance ranking, Texas, the highest ALEC-Laffer state was 22nd at $55,653 and its worst, Michigan, was 33rd at $51,084.

According to the report, the ALEC-Laffer Economic Outlook Ranking is a forecast based on a state’s current standing in 15 state policy variables. Each of these factors is influenced directly by state lawmakers through the legislative process. Generally speaking, states that spend less—especially on income transfer programs, and states that tax less—particularly on productive activities such as working or investing—experience higher growth rates than states that tax and spend more.

The ALEC-Laffer Economic Performance Ranking is a backward-looking measure based on a state’s performance on three important variables: State Gross Domestic Product, Absolute Domestic Migration and Non-Farm Payroll Employ­ment—all of which are highly influenced by state policy. This ranking details states’ individual performances over the past 10 years based on this economic data.

2017 ALEC-Laffer State Economic Competitiveness Index: Economic Outlook Methodology

In previous editions of this report we introduced 15 policy variables that have a proven impact on the migration of capital—both investment and human—into and out of states. The end result of an equal-weighted combination of these variables is the 2017 ALEC-Laffer Economic Outlook rankings of the states. Each of these factors is influenced directly by state lawmakers through the legislative process. The 15 factors and a basic description of their purposes, sourcing and subsequent calculation methodologies are as follows:

HIGHEST MARGINAL PERSONAL INCOME TAX RATE

This ranking includes local taxes, if any, and any impact of federal deductibility, if allowed. A state’s largest city was used as a proxy for local tax rates. Data were drawn from Tax Analysts, Federation of Tax Administrators and individual state tax return forms. Tax rates are as of January 1, 2017.

HIGHEST MARGINAL CORPORATE INCOME TAX RATE

This variable includes local taxes, if any, and in­cludes the effect of federal deductibility, if al­lowed. A state’s largest city was used as a proxy for local tax rates. In the case of gross receipts or business franchise taxes, an effective tax rate was approximated using NIPA profits, rental and proprietor’s income and gross domestic product data. The Texas franchise tax is not a traditional gross receipts tax, but is instead a “margin” tax with more than one rate. A margin tax creates less distortion than does a gross receipts tax. Therefore, what we believe is the best measure­ment for an effective corporate tax rate for Texas is to average the gross receipts tax and the margin tax, leading to our measure of 2.56 percent. Data were drawn from Tax Analysts, Federation of Tax Administrators, individual state tax return forms and the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Tax rates are as of January 1, 2017.

PERSONAL INCOME TAX PROGRESSIVITY

This variable was measured as the difference between the average tax liability per $1,000 at incomes of $50,000 and $150,000. The tax liabili­ties were measured using a combination of effec­tive tax rates, exemptions and deductions at both state and federal levels, which are calculations from Laffer Associates.

PROPERTY TAX BURDEN

This variable was calculated by taking tax rev­enues from property taxes per $1,000 of personal income. We have used U.S. Census Bureau data, for which the most recent year available is 2014. These data were released in December 2016.

SALES TAX BURDEN

This variable was calculated by taking tax rev­enues from sales taxes per $1,000 of personal in­come. Sales taxes taken into consideration include the general sales tax and specific sales taxes. We have used U.S. Census Bureau Data, for which the most recent year available is 2014. Where appro­priate, gross receipts or business franchise taxes, counted as sales taxes in the Census data, were subtracted from a state’s total sales taxes in order to avoid double-counting tax burden in a state. These data were released in June 2016.

REMAINING TAX BURDEN

This variable was calculated by taking tax rev­enues from all taxes—excluding personal income, corporate income (including corporate license), property, sales and severance per $1,000 of per­sonal income. We used U.S. Census Bureau Data, for which the most recent year available is 2014. These data were released in September 2016.

ESTATE OR INHERITANCE TAX (YES OR NO)

This variable assesses if a state levies an estate or inheritance tax. We chose to score states based on either a “yes” for the presence of a state-level estate or inheritance tax, or a “no” for the lack thereof. Data were drawn from McGuire Woods LLP, “State Death Tax Chart” and indicate the presence of an estate or inheritance tax as of January 1, 2017.

RECENTLY LEGISLATED TAX CHANGES

This variable calculates each state’s relative change in tax burden over a two-year period (in this case, the 2015 and 2016 legislative session) for the next fiscal year, using revenue estimates of legislated tax changes per $1,000 of personal income. This timeframe ensures that tax changes will impact a state’s ranking immediately enough to overcome any lags in the tax revenue data. ALEC and Laffer Associates calculations used raw data from state legislative fiscal notes, state budget offices, state revenue offices and other sources, including the National Conference of State Legislators.

DEBT SERVICE AS A SHARE OF TAX REVENUE

Interest paid on debt as a percentage of total tax revenue. This information comes from 2014 U.S. Census Bureau data. These data were released in June 2016.

PUBLIC EMPLOYEES PER 10,000 RESIDENTS

This variable shows the full-time equivalent public employees per 10,000 of population. This infor­mation comes from 2015 U.S. Census Bureau data. These data were released in December 2016.

QUALITY OF STATE LEGAL SYSTEM

This variable ranks tort systems by state. Informa­tion comes from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform 2015 Lawsuit Climate Survey.

STATE MINIMUM WAGE

Minimum wage enforced on a state-by-state ba­sis. If a state does not have a minimum wage, we use the federal minimum wage floor. This infor­mation comes from the U.S. Department of Labor, as of January 1, 2017.

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COSTS

This variable highlights the 2016 Workers’ Com­pensation Index Rate (cost per $100 of payroll). This survey is conducted biennially by the Oregon Department of Consumer & Business Services, In­formation Management Division.

RIGHT-TO-WORK STATE (YES OR NO)

This variable assesses whether or not a state re­quires union membership for its employees. We have chosen to score states based on either a “yes” for the presence of a right-to-work law or a “no” for the lack thereof. This information comes from the National Right to Work Legal Defense and Education Foundation, Inc. Right-to-work sta­tus is as of January 8, 2017.

TAX OR EXPENDITURE LIMIT

States were ranked only by the number of state tax or expenditure limits in place. We measure this by i) a state expenditure limit, ii) mandatory voter approval of tax increases and iii) a superma­jority requirement for tax increases. One point is awarded for each type of tax or expenditure limitation a state has. All tax or expenditure limi­tations measured apply directly to state govern­ment. This information comes from the Cato Insti­tute and other sources. VBM vermontbiz.com

Source: ALEC April 2017