Vermont ranks highest in education spending percentage

Wed Jul 14 2010

Vermont spent $2.2 billion, or 36.7 percent, of public expenditures on education, the highest percentage of any state, though the third lowest total. State and local government spending increased by 6.5 percent in 2008, totaling more than $2.8 trillion, according to the US Census Bureau. Education topped government spending ($826.1 billion), followed by public welfare ($404.6 billion), insurance trust expenditures ($234.6 billion), utilities ($193.4 billion) and highways ($153.5 billion).

These data provide a detailed look at state and local government spending priorities," said Lisa Blumerman, chief of the U.S. Census Bureau's Governments Division. 

 

These findings come from the 2008 Annual Surveys of State and Local Government Finances, which includes data on revenues, expenditures, debt and assets (cash and security holdings) for state and local governments.

Among state and local government spending, housing and community development increased 11.0 percent. Additionally, spending on hospitals increased 8.4 percent and spending on insurance trust systems increased by 9.8 percent (See Table 1[Excel]).

Nationwide, state and local governments spent 2.8 percent on health services (other than hospital care), an increase of 7.4 percent.

State and local governments took in $2.7 trillion in total revenues in fiscal year 2008, a

13.4 percent decline since 2007. This was largely the result of a decrease in insurance trust revenue (See Table 2 [Excel]).

Revenue from taxes, the largest share of state and local government revenue, rose

3.7 percent to $1.3 trillion. Sales and gross receipts made up the largest share of tax revenue ($448.7 billion), followed by property taxes ($409.7 billion) and individual income tax revenue ($304.6 billion) (See Table 2 [Excel]).  

Debt outstanding for state and local governments rose 5.8 percent to $2.6 trillion, while assets declined 1.7 percent to $5.4 trillion.

Other highlights for state and local government finances:

  • Public welfare spending increased 5.2 percent from $384.8 billion to $404.6 billion.
  • Higher education spending increased 9.1 percent from $204.7 billion to $223.3 billion.
  • Spending on education totaled more than 35 percent of expenditures in Vermont (36.7 percent) and Virginia (35.9 percent) (See Table 3 [Excel]).
  • The leading state in expenditures for housing and community development was Louisiana (11.8 percent) (See Table 4[Excel]).

Data in this report are subject to sampling variability as well as nonsampling errors. Sources of nonsampling errors include errors of response, nonreporting and coverage. More details covering the design methodology are available online at http://www2.census.gov/govs/estimate/2008_Local_Finance_Methodology.pdf. All comparative statements in this report have undergone statistical testing, and unless otherwise noted, all comparisons are statistically significant at the 10 percent significance level.

Source: US Census. /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- 7.14.2010. The information can be accessed at http://www.census.gov/govs/estimate/.

RELEASED:  July 14, 2010 (WEDNESDAY)    
(Dollar amounts are in thousands.)    
Table 3. State and Local Government Expenditures on Education 2008  
Area Total Expenditures Expenditures on Education Percent of Total Expenditures  
United States 2,838,835,748 826,063,178 29.1  
Alabama 38,201,262 13,021,210 34.1  
Alaska 12,902,612 3,010,437 23.3  
Arizona 52,533,341 14,040,853 26.7  
Arkansas 20,171,693 6,986,178 34.6  
California 415,436,973 103,871,032 25.0  
Colorado 42,536,683 12,602,587 29.6  
Connecticut 35,080,819 11,126,438 31.7  
Delaware 9,071,609 2,878,324 31.7  
Dist. Of Columbia 12,948,650 2,226,646 17.2  
Florida 158,174,504 41,309,887 26.1  
Georgia 77,708,516 25,650,665 33.0  
Hawaii 13,214,951 3,393,565 25.7  
Idaho 10,781,357 3,168,770 29.4  
Illinois 115,626,761 32,736,157 28.3  
Indiana 49,265,601 15,418,944 31.3  
Iowa 25,785,440 8,689,821 33.7  
Kansas 23,473,117 7,506,496 32.0  
Kentucky 34,358,625 10,632,513 30.9  
Louisiana 45,938,065 11,810,100 25.7  
Maine 11,175,171 3,188,930 28.5  
Maryland 51,224,896 17,201,575 33.6  
Massachusetts 67,895,215 17,305,941 25.5  
Michigan 83,962,165 28,310,913 33.7  
Minnesota 50,844,301 14,802,409 29.1  
Mississippi 25,171,039 7,154,566 28.4  
Missouri 45,101,940 13,938,656 30.9  
Montana 8,116,199 2,522,784 31.1  
Nebraska 18,351,450 5,090,389 27.7  
Nevada 21,462,154 6,226,566 29.0  
New Hampshire 9,967,742 3,419,245 34.3  
New Jersey 91,728,638 30,503,321 33.3  
New Mexico 19,264,191 5,911,778 30.7  
New York 263,436,826 64,743,134 24.6  
North Carolina 72,873,169 22,785,386 31.3  
North Dakota 5,615,939 1,844,941 32.9  
Ohio 102,919,573 30,882,319 30.0  
Oklahoma 27,429,577 9,144,590 33.3  
Oregon 34,560,605 9,674,161 28.0  
Pennsylvania 111,863,060 33,107,240 29.6  
Rhode Island 10,576,149 2,936,240 27.8  
South Carolina 39,740,999 12,252,525 30.8  
South Dakota 5,833,025 1,753,268 30.1  
Tennessee 49,128,077 12,375,698 25.2  
Texas 188,686,230 65,970,133 35.0  
Utah 22,203,709 7,470,556 33.6  
Vermont 6,039,076 2,214,713 36.7  
Virginia 63,272,066 22,692,652 35.9  
Washington 66,692,198 18,041,972 27.1  
West Virginia 13,686,366 4,683,675 34.2  
Wisconsin 49,283,373 15,592,365 31.6  
Wyoming 7,520,051 2,239,914 29.8  
       
Source: 2008 Annual Surveys of State and Local Government Finances. Data users who create their own estimates using data from this report should cite the U.S. Census Bureau as the source of the original data only. The data in this table are based on information from public records and contain no confidential data. The state government data in this table come from a survey of all state governments and are not subject to sampling error.  The local government data in this table are from a sample of local governments, and as such, are subject to sampling variability. Additional information on sampling and nonsampling error, response rates, and definitions may be found at <http://www2.census.gov/govs/state/08_methodology.pdf.> and <http://www2.census.gov/govs/estimate/2008_Local_Finance_Methodology.pdf>.